dating sites free
free online dating sites
free dating sites
online dating sites
dating sites
free dating websites
dating websites
dating site
best dating sites
free online dating

Sex, Status, and Seiðr: Homosexuality and Germanic Religion

Originally published in Idunna 31, 1997

Sex, Status, and Seidh:

Homosexuality and Germanic Religion

by Diana L. Paxson

One of the challenges facing those who seek to practice Asatru today is
that of distinguishing our version of Germanic religion from the perverted
vision promoted by the Nazis. Almost without exception contemporary Norse
pagans eschew any connection with the Nazis as a political movement. But
there is at times a tendency to retain some of their prejudices, attitudes
which are shared by the more reactionary elements among Christians in America
today. The purpose of this article is to examine another characteristic for
which people were sent to the concentration camps by the Nazis, namely,
homosexuality. My purpose is neither to condemn nor to condone, but to move
towards an understanding of the place of the homosexual in contemporary Norse
religion by examining the historical and literary evidence regarding
homosexual practices available from the ancient world.

Homophobia in the Viking Age

Most of Old Norse literature was written down after the introduction of
Christianity (in the 10-11th centuries), however much of its content is older.
The surviving examples include some striking examples of homophobic speech
and behavior. In the Icelandic sagas, wearing the clothing of the opposite
sex was grounds for divorce, and giving a man a gift which could be
interpreted as feminine was an insult.

In the Eddas, warriors taunt each other before battle with sexual insults.
Here is an example of such an interchange from the first “Helgi Lay”–

Sinfjotli: “A witch wast thou on Varins Isle,
didst fashion falsehoods and fawn on me, hag:
to no wight wouldst thou be wed but to me…”
“Thou wast, witch-hag, a valkyrie fierce…
On Saga Ness full nine wolves we

had together– I gat them all.”

Guthmund: “…gelded wast thou near Gnipa Grove
by thurs maidens on Thor’s Ness, before…
wast Grani’s bride on Brávoll Field…
full many a space I spurred thee on…”


Sinfjotli then accuses Guthmund of milking she-goats and being Imth’s
daughter, “a tattered troll-wench”. Not only is the foe accused of having
been a female, but a witch, valkyrie, troll-wench, or shape-shifter,
specifically into the form of a she-wolf or a mare (forms commonly associated
with supernatural or magical women), indicating a connection between
transexuality and spiritual power.

Such taunts are exchanged even by the gods–

Odin: “Thou winters eight wast the earth beneath
milking the cows as a maid,

and there gavest birth to a brood:
were these womanish ways, I ween.”

Loki:”But thou, say they, on Sáms Isle once
beat (the magic drum?) like a Vœlva:
in vitki’s shape through the worlds didst fare:

in woman’s wise, I ween.”
(“Lokasenna,” 23-24)

The story of how Loki took the form of a mare to distract the jotun’s
stallion, and bore the magic steed Sleipnir, how he ate a woman’s heart and
spent twelve years as a woman, giving birth to Fenris, the Midgard Serpent,
and Hella, is well-known, but it is surprising to find anyone accusing Odin
of effeminacy. However the passage in which Snorri describes Odin’s shamanic
skills (learned, presumably from the Vanir) ends with the memorable

“But the use of this magic is accompanied by so great a degree of
effemination (ergi) that men were of the opinion that they could not
give themselves up to it without shame, so that it was to the
priestesses that it was taught.”
(Ynglingasaga: 7)

Here, as in the previous passage, a connection is made between degeneracy,
the female role, and magic, a link whose significance should become clearer
as we go on.

Origins and attitudes

For a man to take a female role, especially in a sexual relationship, was
socially unacceptable to the Vikings. How ancient, and how deeply ingrained
was this idea, and what, if any, influence can be traced to Christianity?

One possibility is that the Germanic tribes originally followed the custom
of some earlier peoples, in which adolescent boys were initiated into manhood
by becoming the lovers of mature warriors. According to the first century
B.C. Geography, of Strabo, drawing on the even earlier work of
Ephorus, 4th cen. B.C., on the island of Crete, an older man of superior
status trained the younger in the skills expected of a man, and when the boy
had completed his training, demonstrated by some feat such as killing a wild
animal, his “graduation” was celebrated and his manhood acknowledged, making
him eligible to take a wife and a boy to train in turn.

The new warrior received arms, a bull, which was immediately sacrificed
and eaten at the feast of celebration, and a cup, which was presumably used
in drinking rituals like sumbel or the Greek symposium. In a somewhat modified
form this was still the custom in Classical Greece. Strabo uses the Greek
term erastés, “lover” to denote the active partner in the
relationship– the husband in a heterosexual couple or the person who plays
the male role in a homosexual relationship; and the word eromenos

(passive past participle of the verb eramai, “to desire
sexually”), to refer to the partner who takes the passive role. (Sergent,
p. 8)

The evidence for love between men of equal status is less clear. Achilles
and Patroclos are probably the best known male lovers. The Romans accused the
Gauls of being unduly tolerant of such affairs, but unless the relationship
between Cuchulain and Ferdiad is an example, there is little indication of it
in Irish literature.

Some Roman writers insist that not only were Germanic females perfectly
chaste, but that the men abhorred homosexuality. Tacitus, for instance, stated
that those convicted of corpore infames were buried alive in a
swamp (Germania, 12). Others, on the other hand, suggest that the
kind of institutionalized pederasty described above was practiced in at least
some of the tribes. Procopius implies that the young men of the Heruli had to
serve their elders until they had proved themselves in battle, while according
to Ammianus,

…the Taifali are so sunk in gross sensuality that among them boys
couple with men in a union of unnatural lust, and waste the flower
of their youth in the polluted embraces of their lovers. But if a
young man catches a boar single-handed or kills a huge bear, he is
exempt thereafter from the contamination of this lewd intercourse.”

In this system, the passive partner was of lower status. As soon as the boy
became an equal, the relationship would end. In Crete, if a boy was
“abducted” by a man of lower social status, his relatives would pursue and
rescue him, whereas a man of the same or higher status conferred an honor on
the youth by taking him. Perhaps relationships between mature men were
condemned while those between a man and an adolescent were approved, or
perhaps practices differed from tribe to tribe. Certainly Tacitus’ averral
that German men had only one wife is contravened by evidence that in tribes
such as the Franks, and later among the Vikings, it was common for kings at
least to have more than one official lady.

To understand how this varied situation developed into the homophobia of
the Viking period, we must also consider attitudes towards homosexuality in
Late Classical and Medieval culture and law. Pagan writers such as Tacitus,
concerned about declining fertility and moral laxity in the upper classes of
Rome, castigated homosexuality along with anything else that might threaten
Roman Family Values. The early Church fathers, who admitted married
heterosexual love only as a poor second best to chastity, were even more
scathing in their condemnations.

Roman law, reflecting actual rather than ideal contemporary sexual
practices, was far slower to respond. Even the Code of Justinian did no more
than to prescribe confiscation of half the property and banishment for men
who corrupted other free men by using them homosexually. Note that it was the
status of the passive partner, not the act itself, that made such relations a
crime. There was still apparently no penalty for so using one’s own slave. It
was not until the Church had completed its domination of the legal system in
the later Middle Ages that homosexuality became a crime for which men could
be burned.

Homosexuality in Scandinavian Law

According to Gade’s excellent analysis, a measure in the Old Norwegian
Gulathingslog, Ch. 32 passed in 1164 provides that two men who
“enjoy the pleasures of the flesh” and are convicted be outlawed and their
possessions confiscated. This regulation, part of the laws introduced by King
Magnus Erlingsson, was apparently inspired (as were so many
witch-persecutions) by greed, and is the only anti-homosexual measure in
medieval Scandinavian law. Severe penalties for homosexuality do not appear
even in Continental sources until the 13th century. In the 12th century, the
punishment was likely to be penance, as it was for incest or fornication.

In the earlier period, the “crime against nature” is bestiality, which is
explicitly forbidden , and punished by castration and outlawry, while the
animal is drowned. Later, increasingly severe penalties instituted on the
Continent included burning alive. However the provision against homosexuality
disappeared from later Norwegian law and such provisos were not reintroduced
even when Continental law on the subject began to grow more harsh.

Although homosexual relationships existed in Old Norse society, such
behavior was not punishable by Church or secular law, except as a sin
mentioned in the penitentials. It is not known to what extent the provision
in chapter 32 of the Gulathingslog, was enforced: the fact that
the section was not retained in Norwegian law when homosexual behavior began
to incur severe penalties on the Continent shows that the regulation must have
been alien to medieval Scandinavian legislation.” (Gade, p. 135)

If the accused denied their crime, they must prove their innocence by the
ordeal of the hot iron, and if convicted, would lose their possessions, but
no further action was taken. Furthermore, “None of the Leges
contain provisions against homosexual behavior, and the
Carolingian legislation…contains general admonitions to stay away from this
sin but enacts no severe punishments for it. (126) In other words, while
homosexual behavior may have been socially unacceptable, Norse tradition did
not consider it something which the State ought to regulate.

In early Scandinavian law, (Stadharholzbok, vigslodhi: 376)
calling another man ragr, strodhinn, or
sordhinn, words implying sexual subordination, was a gross
verbal insult, punishable with outlawry. “A man has also the right to kill
for these three words.” Even though skaldic poetry sometimes got so insulting
that there was a law against slander in verse, no poems survive which contain
any of these terms.

In Bjarnars saga a man called Thordhr may have been raped by
one Bjorn. Later, a pair of nidhstengr are set up on Thordhr’s property. “The
nidhstengr illustrated two men in sexual intercourse, the implications being
emphasized by the fact that one of them was wearing a hat, an attribute of
Odhinn, a god charged with (active) homosexual behavior. There is no doubt
that the nidhstengr were meant to disgrace Thordhr and imply that he had been
used as a woman…” (Gade, p. 134)

Gade also points out that while taking the passive role in intercourse was
considered degrading for a free man, the same attitude did not apply to
thralls. Just as in the case of violation of a man’s wife or female kindred,
forcing sex on a thrall, whether male or female, was not an offense against
morality, but against property rights, and only then did it become punishable
under the Old Norwegian penal code.

All of the references dealt with so far have to do with homosexual
relationships between males. In material written by and for men, this is not
surprising. Often the ancient writers simply did not care how females
exercised their sexuality (so long as the results did not threaten rights of
paternity), in the same way that they did not care as much about female
spirituality as they did about that of men. Apparently the Norse prejudice was
not against male homosexuality per se, the desire of a man to make love to
another man, but against a man’s taking the woman’s role in a
sexual relationship.

In other words, the concern in Old Norse society is not about relationships
which involve sharing the “pleasures of the flesh”, but rather with sexual
assault. The one who has the power to rape, whether the victim be male or
female, has demonstrated superior strength, and thus, status. In some Native
American cultures the victorious warriors raped the men (but not the women) of
a conquered tribe as a demonstration of their superiority.

Rationally, this does not make sense. If there is a sin, it ought to lie
with the one initiating the action instead of with the receptive partner, who
may not even be a willing participant. However sexual relationships with male, as with female, slaves, were outside the social system, and therefore did not
count. Clearly the prejudice here is not based on horror at unnatural desires,
but rather on fear of loss of status, or control. The issue is one of

The female role in magic

The same social forces which led to the degradation of female sexuality
also acted upon perceptions of magic and those who employed it. A study by
Jenny Jochens explores the social roles of sorcerers. She identifies a
tripartite division of magic users:

At one end of the spectrum are people who readily and easily
predicted the future thanks to innate abilities and without recourse
to magic. At the other are sorcerers who through instrumental magic
were able to manipulate the future according to their own and their
clients’ wishes. In the middle we find practitioners who by using a
magical ritual were capable of extracting information about the future
but unable to change the course of events.”
(p. 306)

According to her analysis, women dominate the first group, although later
men are said to have this talent too. In the sagas, members of the middle
group (those who predict the future through ritual) are all female. Jochens
believes that seidh was originally practiced only by women. However this idea
is not consistent with Snorri’s comment in the Ynglingasaga.
Certainly references to seidh in general (Jochens’ third group) are evenly
divided betwen men and women.

Female workers of magic abound in the sagas. Female magicians like Thordis
the spakona in Thorvalds thattr ens Vidsforla, often took young
men as their pupils. In the Eyrbyggja saga, Gunnlaugr’s pupil
Geirridhr dies because of the jealousy of another sorceress, Katla. Biological
or adoptive mothers teach magic to their sons– Ljot to her son Hrolleifr
in Vatansdaelasaga, or Thorgunna who raised Thorsteinn. Thordis
raised Thorvaldr, who became the companion of the first Icelandic bishop,
Fridhrekr (and possibly his lover). Fridhrekr himself is presented in the
saga as a spamadhr, which could be held to deepen the implication of
connection between homosexuality and female magic.

On the Continent, the Church’s hostility quickly made men abandon magic,
thus (re)feminizing the art. (314) Jochens contends that the Icelanders
succeeded in moving magic completely from female to male domination, as
evidenced by the fact that Icelandic witch-persecutions were directed almost
solely at men. In Scandinavia, on the other hand, women were more often

Jochens sees the involvement of men in seidh (however despised) as a
devolution from ancient times. “Originally a monopoly of the goddesses, the
magic seidhr was needed by human sibyls to perform their predictions. This
connection between women and goddesses suggests that not only divination, but
also magic had originally been a female monopoly…. ” (307)

I would rather suggest that it was not female physiology, but a female
identity or social role which was the prerequisite for access to certain
kinds of spiritual power. Certainly there is evidence that transexuality had
a recognized place in the religion of the barbarian period.

Tacitus tells us that the Naharvali, a Suevian tribe, possessed a grove
of “. . .immemorial sanctity. A priest in female attire (ornatus
had the charge of it.” (43) In this grove twin deities
called the Alcis and identified with Castor and Pollux were worshipped. We
must also cite the well-known passage from Saxo, describing how Starkad,
having lived for some years with the Swedish royal family, returns to
Denmark, “for, living at Uppsala in the period of sacrifices, he had become
disgusted with the womanish body movements, the clatter of actors on the
stage, and the soft tinkling of bells.” (History of the Danes
VI:154) )

The Yngling kings were devotees of the Vanir, whose cult practices are
characteristic of an agricultural fertility religion. Transvestite priests
in earlier cultures of this kind are known to have engaged in ritual
homosexuality. Such ritual cross-dressing (without, however, necessarily
involving sexual inversion) has survived in European festival customs such
as the Wren Hunt and Mardi Gras parade.


In the passage describing Odin’s magic, Snorri uses a specific term,
“ergi” to indicate the shamefulness of seidh magic. In other contexts this
word and its derivatives are usually translated as lust or lewdness,
specifically in the sense of sexual receptiveness. Another translation might
be “desirous of penetration”. The term seems, in fact, to be a close analogue
of the Greek eromenos. Men use the word as an insult, accusing
a foe of having submitted sexually like a woman. It is used to describe Freyja. However the term is also used in contexts relating to magic. What Loki
actually accuses Odin of is not being “womanish”, as it is usually translated,
but of “args athal”– acting in “a sexually receptive way.” The context makes
it clear that what he was doing was working women’s magic.

In Volsathattr, the term is used to describe the vingull–
the horse’s phallus, which is an overt sexual symbol. Magically its purpose
might have been to enable the “luck” or spiritual power of
prosperity/fertility to “penetrate” the physical realm.

These references may help us to understand how effeminacy and passive
homosexuality became equated with magical power. Effective magic requires
the practitioner to unite the powers of the conscious and unconscious, of
intelligence and emotion. In many shamanic traditions, cross-dressing allows
the shaman to walk “between” genders, and to unite or balance within him or
herself the abilities associated with each. Upsetting ordinary gender
assumptions loosens the psyche and allows one to perceive in a new way.

Shamanic and ecstatic religious experience, unlike ceremonial magic,
requires the practitioner to open him or herself to divine power. In its
most extreme form, this loss of consciousness may lead to states in which
the medium becomes compeletely controlled by the possessing deity. Another
form is the ecstatic rapture of mysticism, a state leading some later
Christian theologians to speak of the soul as “feminine” in relation to God.
It is possible to see how early Christian attempts to suppress paganism might
have have focused on these practices (which generated the greatest amount of
magical power) for especial opposition. Female spiritual power was already
suspect, to be suppressed or channeled into specifically subordinate roles
wherever it appeared, and Christian misogyny may have also increased prejudice
against men who worked the kind of magic associated with women.

Late Norse homophobia seems to be inextricably connected to late Norse
misogyny. Femaleness and Magic were both severely repressed and thrust into
the dark, chthonic realm of the unconscious, which therefore became a place of
horror and fear. This represents a major shift from the situation in most
pagan cultures, which recognized and valued chthonic and liminal power, and
saw in it a necessary balancing aspect of spirituality. Perhaps the degree to
which horror of “woman’s magic” is expressed in the Saga period provides a
measure of the prestige in which women’s spiritual power was held in earlier


For purposes of cross-cultural comparison, Walter Williams’ classic study
of trans-sexual status in Native American culture is suggestive. Although the
role of the berdache is not found in all Amerind tribes, it does
appear in many of them as a culturally acceptable, even valued, alternative
to ordinary sexuality. The berdache occupies a third status in the tribe,
that of the androgyne, recognized as being distinct from either masculine or
feminine, and this liminality is believed to give him/her extra spiritual
power. Rather than being despised, the berdache fulfills valuable functions
in the community, and neither s/he nor the masculine men who are sexually
connected with him/her are stigmatized. It is accepted that men who play a
conventional role in sexual relations (i.e. dominance) may be equally
interested in effeminate males or in true females. It is also assumed that
most men will engage in homosexual play at some time in their lives, and may
take a passive role sexually without change in status if they continue to
otherwise play the masculine part in the culture.

One may hypothesize that in tribal societies, including European cultures
before their exposure to Middle Eastern dualistic and monotheistic influences,
sexual identity depends more on social role than it does on sexual behavior.
Extramarital homosexual relationships may in fact be engaged in more freely
than heterosexual ones, since they will not produce children. The institution
of the third-sex role exists to accomodate those whose physical and spritual
genders are not the same, and tends to acquire a sacred character.


The key to the problem of interpreting Germanic attitudes towards
homosexuality seems to be the relationship of passivity/receptivity to the
feminine gender role. Of the variants in homosexual behavior– berdache;
boy-man pairings; and the pairings of macho men– I would speculate that the
one which was most common in the ancient North was transexuality, because of
later references to effeminate dress in a religious context, and because
sexual passivity is used as an insult later on.

The culture was less concerned with the behavior of women. One would
assume, however, that the tradition of valkyries and the prohibitions against
women dressing like men indicated some tradition of women at times adopting a
masculine role. The spakona Thorhild is said to have girded herself like a man
with a helmet on her head in order to prophesy. As far as sexual behavior was
concerned, it is likely that same-sex preference became a problem only if it
interfered with serving the interests of the kin-group by marrying and bearing

Given the above, what conclusions can be drawn regarding the place of
homosexuality in a social group which is attempting to live by the old
Germanic values?

Clearly in a traditional culture the criminality of sexual behavior
depends less on the gender of the partners than on their relative social
status– their freedom to refuse. Whether any act (of sex or magic) is
considered shameful depends on the status of those with whom it is typically
associated in that society. If women are defined by a culture as submissive,
and if one considers women inferior, then it becomes shameful for a person
of socially superior status (a male) to submit sexually.

As Williams puts it, “It may be accurate to suggest that the status of
berdaches in a society is directly related to the status of women. In
societies which ascribe low status to women, a male who would want to give
up his dominant position would be seen as crazy. But where women have high
status, there is no lowering of social role for a male to move in a feminine
direction.” (p. 66)

In a society in which women are considered to be equal to men, or even to
have abilities which though different from those of men are equally valuable,
there should be far more tolerance for a man who takes a traditionally female
role. When the relationship is not one of submission to a social superior,
but a free association of equal partners, then even the conditions of Viking
homophobia become irrelevant. Ethically, one should not force sexual
attentions on anyone, be it man, woman, or sheep.

Even in the period of the sagas, Scandinavian women enjoyed a degree of
respect and freedom unknown in the rest of Europe. In seeking role models for
magical work, however, I would prefer to focus on the earlier Germanic
culture in which women held such a high position as spiritual leaders. It is
from this period as well that we draw most of our evidence for the existence
of a “berdache” role in Germanic religion, as well as for homosexual practices
among warriors. The earlier and less affected by Christian ideas the culture
we examine is, the more likely it is to accord women spiritual equality and
to provide a culturally defined place for sexual inversion.

Taking such a liminal role is not necessary to practice Norse magic. It is
true, however, that a condition of openness and receptivity is extremely
useful in some kinds of magic, specifically those involving relinquishing
conscious control in trance. In a culture which traditionally requires males
to be intellectual, controlled, and dominant, gay men, who have already had
to question so many assumptions about the relationship between social role
and gender, may find it somewhat easier to attain a state of
spiritual receptivity than conventionally heterosexual males.

However it must be emphasized that psychic receptivity has less to do
with sexuality than with socialization. Those– be they male, female, or
other, who have the courage to work outside stereotypes, the clarity to
accept all aspects of their own nature, the self-discipline to
develop the requisite skills, and the devotion to trust themselves to the
gods, should be able to work seidh, no matter what their sexual identity.
Furthermore, this kind of magical work is only one aspect of Germanic
religion. Though devotion to the old gods may be variously expressed, there
should be room for persons of all sexual orientations within Asatru.


  • Walter L. Williams, The Spirit and the Flesh, Sexual Diversity
    in American Indian Culture
    , Boston: Beacon Press, 1992
  • Quintillian, Declamation de milite Mariao, 8:16 (Bleabtreu Ehrenberg,
    1981, 36-37)
  • Ammianus Marcellinus, The Later Roman Empire, Penguin,
  • Complete Works of Tacitus, ed. Moses Hadas, Modern
    Library College Editions, 1942
  • Jenny Jochens, “Norse Magic and Gender”, Scandinavian
    : Summer 1991, Vol. 63:3
  • Kari Ellen Gade, “Homosexuality and Rape of Males in Old Norse Law
    and Literature”, Scandinavian Studies, 58/2, 1986
  • Saxo Grammaticus, Gesta Danorum (The History of the
    , Cambridge: D.S.Brewer, 1979
  • Bernard Sergent, Homosexuality in Greek Myth, Boston:
    Beacon Press, 1986
  • Jim Wafer, The Taste of Blood: Spirit Possession in Brazilian
    , University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991